| Related sites for http://www.ferleger.com/adapri.html |
| Nancy_Moran_-_Independent_Prisoner_Advocate Promotes the well being of prisoners in Maryland and, to a limited extent, those released from prison. | | New_York_Correction_History_Society Articles and photos about history of state correctional services, including probation, parole, juvenile justice, incarceration alternatives, community correction, restorative justice. | | North_Carolina_Division_of_Prisons Information about the prison system and its programs. | | Prison_Legal_News Reports on court decisions affecting prisoners and contains information designed to help prisoners vindicate their rights in the judicial system. | | The_Prison_Reform_Trust Aims to create a just, humane, and effective penal system. Research, publications, current projects, and event information. | | Prisoners_and_Punishment Prisoners and Punishment, from your About.com Guide | | A_Prisoner\'s_Dictionary A dictionary of prison slang. | | Sentencing_Scoresheet_Compliance_Report This report details the compliance of each Florida judicial circuit in submitting sentencing scoresheets for offenders convicted of felonies between July 1, 1998 and June 30, 1999. | | Standard_Minimum_Rules_for_the_Treatment_of_Prisoners Complete text of the United Nations treaty. | | Tattoos__Recognition_and_Interpretation Tattoo recognition and interpretation is a valuable tool when dealing with state prison parolees. | | Death__Suicide Educational site about death in general, and suicide in particular. Covers different types of suicide. | | Ethics_Side_of_Suicide Ethical issues associated with suicide treatment, intervention and facilitated suicide. | | Leaving_You__The_Cultural_History_of_Suicide__by_Lisa_Lieberman Book review by Natalie Hope McDonald. The book is a reminder of how the taking of one's own life can be representative of more than just depression, that rather, it can become, for better or worse, a | | LIFE__Living_is_for_Everyone An Australian government project presents factsheets, links, policies, and statistics. | | A_Lucid_Examination_of_the_History_and_Meaning_of_Suicide Book critique of "Leaving You, The Cultural Meaning of Suicide", by Lisa Lieberman. | | The_Many_Languages_of_Suicide David Webb, a suicide attempter and a Suicidologist at Victoria University, advocates creating safe spaces where the suicidal voice can be heard with respect and full acceptance, emphasizing the perso | | Suicide IRCnet site contains lyrics, hangman game, FAQ, guestbook and statistics. | | Suicide Definition from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. | | Suicide_Contagion_&_Reporting_Suicide Recommendations on how to report suicide in media without causing contagion (the triggering of other suicide incidents). | | Suicide_in_Art,_Film_and_Literature From the Literature, Arts, and Medicine Database. | | Suicide_is_Painless Lyrics of the theme song from M*A*S*H. | | Suicide_Lodge Contains both pro-life and pro-choice views; it does not take a stand on this issue. Includes information about methods, how various religions view suicide, stories and statistics. | | Suicide_Survivor_FAQs Some frequently asked questions about suicide survivors. | | To_Be_or_not_to_Be__An_Investigation_of_Artists_and_Suicide suicide and dying is an art | | What_if_Someone_Commits_Suicide Motivations and interpretations of suicide. Suicide in history. From a Christian doctor who specializes in Multiple Personality Disorder. | | Australia\'s_Future A prediction about the nature of the impending Republic of Australia. | | Carfree_City_Design Exploring the prospect of designing auto-less, sustainable communities with alternative transportation, renewable energy, pedestrian orientation, mixed-use zoning, fiber optics and recycling facilitie | | The_Collegiate_Landscape_of_the_Future The universities of the future won't be built around the Internet; they will be built around small residential colleges. | | Dr__Arthur_B__Shostak Professor of Sociology, and futurist. Includes his essays and book reviews. | | Future_Studies Essays on change, the future of humanity, and transhumanism, by Nick Bostrom; archival site, no longer updated. | | Future_Studies__An_Interdisciplinary_Vehicle_for_Space_Science_Education Essay on futures studies' use in the space science curriculum which includes example methods, suggested reading, and three futures course descriptions. | | Future\'s_Edge Topics include world population, stem cell research, limits of science, climate change, and anthrax. Includes links to other resources. | | Futurlogics_a_system_of_prospective_thinking Research method and a predictive model for dealing with the unknown. | | Innovation_Watch Follows developments in science, technology, business, society and the environment and assesses their impact. | | Manifesto_for_the_Peoples_of_the_Third_Millennium An outline of processes for developing progressive alternative societies. | | A_Message_From_Future_Generations People of the future give advice on spiritual and political development. Excerpts from Dr. Allen Tough's book of the same title. | | News_for_a_Synergic_Earth A collection of discussions and articles focused on culture, systems thinking and how to create a more sustainable future. | | 100_Phenomena Complete English text from the Finnish book "100 Phenomena" by Risto Linturi and Ilkka Hannula containing miniature scenarios for the years 2000 to 2020 illustrating what may happen in our future and | | Philosophy_of_Technology Several essays centered on how the world will cope with humanity's natural drive towards cultural and physical speciation. | | Reflections_Of_A_Changing_Era Reflections Of A Changing Era, The American Dream, by Jim Bickford. |
|
Disability Law Jewish Developmental Mental Health Special Master Southbury Training School Legal  ADA and Prisons These are selected cases on issue of applicability of Americans With Disabilities Act to prisons. Cases go both ways. First listed are those saying ADA does NOT apply, followed by those which say ADA DOES apply. This is not exhaustive list; it is intended to give a flavor for current caselaw. A case to watch is the 3d Cir.'s INMATES OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY in which, in September, 1996, a pro-ADA panel opinion was withdrawn when the 3d Cir ordered the case be reheard en banc. Cases holding ADA does NOT apply to prisons Cases holding ADA DOES apply to prisons ADA does not apply to prisons BRYANT v MADIGAN, 84 F.3d 246 (7th Cir. 1996). Paraplegic inmate sued prison employees under Eighth Amendment and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for refusing request for guardrails for bed and denying him pain medication. HELD: No claim under ADA. QUOTE Court: Under ADA, re prisoners, "Even if such persons are protected, however, which we need not decide (for Congress may not have wanted to burden the states with the potentially enormous costs of making their prisons fully accessible to disabled visitors and employees), it would not necessarily follow that prisons or jails that offer educational or vocational programs for prisoners must redesign their programs to accommodate the needs of disabled prisoners. It is very far from clear that prisoners should be considered "qualified individual[s]" within the meaning of the Act. Could Congress really have intended disabled prisoners to be mainstreamed into an already highly restricted prison society? Most rights of free Americans, including constitutional rights such as the right to free speech, to the free exercise of religion, and to marry, are curtailed when asserted by prisoners; and there are formidable practical objections to burdening prisons with having to comply with the onerous requirements of the Act, especially when we reflect that alcoholism and other forms of addiction are disabilities within the meaning of the Act and afflict a substantial proportion of the prison population." * * * "Even if there were (as we doubt) some domain of applicability of the Act to prisoners, the Act would not be violated by a prison's simply failing to attend to the medical needs of its disabled prisoners. No discrimination is alleged; Bryant was not treated worse because he was disabled. His complaint is that he was not given special accommodation." END QUOTE WHITE v. COLORADO, 82 F.3d 364, (10th Cir.1996). HELD: ADA does not apply to prison employment situations TORCASIO V.MURRAY, 57 F.3d 1340 (4th Cir.1995), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 772, 133 L.Ed.2d 724 (1996). Court implied that ADA does not apply to state prisons. HELD: at the time of the alleged discrimination, it was not clearly established that the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act apply to state prisons, and, consequently, the defendant prison officials were entitled to qualified immunity under these statutes. CRAWFORD v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION, 937 F.Supp. 785 (N.D. Ind. 1996). Blind inmate initiated suit under Americans withDisabilities Act (ADA) and Rehabilitation Act against prison, claiming he was denied access (with or without reasonable accommodations) to prison programs. On motion for judgment on pleadings, HELD that neither ADA nor Rehabilitation Act were applicable to inmate's claims that he was denied access to programs, services, facilities, activities, and benefits which were routinely available to general population of offenders. Absent clear statement of intent by Congress to cover prisons, prisons are not covered by ADA. PIERCE v. KING, 918 F.Supp. 932 (E.D. N. Ca. 1996) Prisoner suit. HELD: ADA did not create cause of action for inmate displeased with his prison work assignment. SUMMARY: Court found that effects of prison labor upon interstate commerce were not sufficiently substantial to legitimate application of labor laws such as ADA to state prisons, and, even if some positive rights to receive entitlement benefits under ADA were rooted in Fourteenth Amendment, the requisite employment and public access relationships did not exist between prisoners and prisons, and Fourteenth Amendment did not create positive right to prison work assignments. LITTLE v. LYCOMING COUNTY, 912 F.Supp. 809 (M.D. Pa. 1996) Inmate sued county prison and officials, and medical personnel atprison, re denial of medical care, and re exposure to cigarette smoke. HELD: ADA is not applicable to facilities provided for prisoners in prisons. Court: ADA would cover prison operations only if Congress clearly expressed intent to apply to prisons. Federalism principles apply with special force re prisons. STAPLES v. VIRGINIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, 904 F.Supp. 487 (E.D. Va. 1995) Paraplegic inmate sued state prison system andcorrectional management company under ADA. HELD: ADA does not appl;y in state prison context. KING v. EDGAR, __ F.Supp. __ (N.D. Ill., Dec. 4, 1996). Prisoner sued Governor and prison officials. Issue for court: whether to permit in forma pauperis filing, for which court needs to consider substantiality of claims sought to be presented. Plaintiff alleged he is schizophrenic, assigned to a special treatment center, and is discriminated against in that he is denied good time credit for educational programs, while other prisoners get such credit. Claim under ADA is presented. HELD: ADA does not apply to prisons. QUOTE Although: "The term "public entity" is defined to include any department, agency, or instrumentality of state or local government; prisons and correctional programs are not excluded. Æ 42 U.S.C. s 12131(1)." the ADA does not apply to prisons. See next quote. QUOTE "This court agrees with the Seventh Circuit that it is so unlikely thatCongress envisioned mandating equal participation for disabled prisoners that an exception should be inferred. Congress determined that free disabled citizens should be entitled to share in the benefits state and local governments provide for their able-bodied citizens. The exclusion of disabled citizens from civic benefits and services paid for with their taxesappeared unjust. But persons imprisoned as a punishment for crime, whether disabled or not, receive benefits such as educational programs by the grace of the state, not as a matter of entitlement. [FN2] As a practical matter, since the states are not required to provide educational opportunities for prisoners, if they were required to provide programs tailored for disabled individuals as a condition of offering them to non-disabled individuals, states could well decide to offer none at all. I would therefore be inclined to agree with Magistrate Judge Pierce in ÆCrawford v. Indiana Department of Corrections, 937 F.Supp. 785 (N.D. Ind. 1996), who held that neither the Rehabilitation Act nor the ADA apply to state prisoners." END QUOTE ADA does apply to prisons INMATES OF THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL v. WECHT, 93 F.3d 1124 WITHDRAWN. This is at 1996 WL 474106 (3rd Cir.(Pa.)The 3d Cir. decided that the ADA does apply to prisons in its August 22, 1996 panel opinion in this case. However, this opinion was VACATED on September 20, 1996 when the court en banc granted rehearing en banc. The panel opinion was by that order withdrawn from the bound volume. DUFFY v. RIVELAND, 98 F.3d 447 (9th Cir. 1996) Deaf inmate who denied interpreter at prison disciplinary and classification proceedings sued under ADA with other claims. HELD: summary judgment for prison officials REVERSED because fact issues on interpreter qualifications and inmate ability to communicate with interpreter. Court implies that ADA claim can proceed in prison context. Court HELD: Prison disciplinary and classification hearings were "programs" within meaning of ADA. NIECE v. FITZNER, 922 F.Supp. 1208 (E.D. Mich. 1996) Prisoner and prisoner's deaf fiance brought civil rights suit under Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Rehabilitation Act, and state law. HELD: prison's provision of telephone access to prisoners was "service" within meaning of ADA; compensatory damages were available under ADA. NIECE v. FITZNER, 941 F.Supp. 1497 (E.D. Mich. 1996) After 922 F.Supp. 1208, above, defendants again moved to dismiss federalclaims.Motion Denied. Court accepted Magistrate Judge's report and HELD that: (1) Congress in enacting ADA and Rehabilitation Act abrogated sovereign immunity of states under Eleventh Amendment, and (2) both ADA and Rehabilitation Act apply to state prisons. BULLOCK v GOMEZ, 929 F.Supp. 1299 (C.D. Cal. 1996) HIV-positive inmate and his wife sued correctional officials, asserting that refusal to allow overnight visits violated Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) and Rehabilitation Act. On Summary Judgment, HELD: ADA and Rehabilitation Act applied to state correctional facilities; here, fact questions re undue burden and other issues precluded summary judgment. ARMSTRONG v. WILSON, 942 F.Supp. 1252 (N.D. Cal. 1996) Disabled state prison inmates filed class action against prison officials. HELD ADA and Rehabilitation Act applies to state prisons. Summary judgment denied. CLARKSON v. COUGHLIN, 898 F.Supp. 1019 (S.D. N.Y. 1995) Deaf and hearing-impaired inmates sued state prison officials, allegingdenial of accommodation of hearing impairments as violation of ADA and other rights. HELD: ADA violated by a) denial of information regarding the Act and location of accessible services, b) prison failure to provide disabled inmates with opportunity to request auxiliary aids and services of their choice, c) failure to resond to inmate requests for accommodations, d) failure of prison to do self-evaluation re inmate housing under ADA, e) failure to establish effective grievance procedure for deaf and hearing impaired inmates regarding accommodations, f) failure toprovide interpreters for reception/classification, g) failure to provide access to telephone devices, close caption for TV, fire alarms, h) exclusion from programs. CLARK v. STATE, __ F.Supp. __, 1996 WL 628221 (N.D.Cal., Oct. 1, 1996) On motion to dismiss class action claims by two prisonerswith developmental disabilities (retardation) that they cannot obtain necessary and adequate accommodations, protection, and services because of their disabilities. HELD: ADA applies to state prisons. QUOTE "For instance, Clark was denied medication because of his "stupidity" and, although recommended for placement in Category K, a designation for prisoners with mental retardation, he was denied access to the program. Woods was denied access to work and education programs and was rejected from a reading program because of his "stupidity." Furthermore, because they are less able to comply with prison rules and procedures, they are more likely to be forced into isolation or segregation and to be deprived of good time credits and other services, benefits, and privileges available to non-disabled prisoners. Plaintiffs also claim that they have been subjected to a variety of administrative proceedings, including disciplinary actions, without adequate assistance to help them understand the proceedings and the rights implicated bythem. Clark and Woods are also more likely to be physically and mentally abused by the general prison population because of their disabilities. END QUOTE NOLAND v. WHEATLEY, 835 F.Supp. 476 (N.D. Ind. 1993). Semiquadriplegic inmate sued under ADA and state law. HELD: ADA does apply in prison context, and no qualified immunity for defendants to ADA claims. |
|